Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 970725_dec96_decls29_0011.txt
Subject = COMMAND CHRONOLOGY 11TH MARINES 13 MAR 91
Parent Organization = SECDEF
Unit = HQMC
Folder Title = 11TH MARINES COMMAND CHRONOLOGY JAN FEB 91 SEC 1 OF 2
Document Number = 1
Box ID = BX600135
UNCLASSIFIED
division target list based on current Iraqi positions.
In addition to the four division fire support plans during the
months of January and February, the division FSCC also assisted in
the development of a fire support plan for TF XRAY's hel4borne
assault into blocking positions on the division's right +lank past
the second obstacle belt (published 192200C Feb 91). This plan
included a target list and schedule of -Fire to suppress enemy
positions along the flight corridor to the landing zones. It also
included schedules designed to suppress the enemy during the
vulnerable period when the task force was initially getting
organized on the ground.
RAIDS
During January and February, tie Ist MarDiv conducted a number
of raids (attached) as a part of its deception/etmbiguity
operations. The PSCC Target In-Formation Officer, working in
conjunction with the G-2 Target Intelligence Officer, was critical
in the selection of high value targets for engagement. The
Electronic Warfare 0-Fficer assisted in coordinating radar jamming
support for the raids and the division air section coordinated
support packages which included a combination of the following:
MEDEVAC with escort; fast FAC coverage; FLIR aircraft; jammer
aircraft; attack aircraft =overage, and CIFS aircraft.
Some of the earlier raids caused the enemy to respond with
counter battery fires after which the FAC-A would direct attack
aircraft onto the target for engagement. Later raids did not
elicit the same enemy response as he apparently became aware of the
division's tactics. The final raid of 10 Feb was an illumination
only raid, designed to make ttie enemy believe the artillery
illumination was actually that being dropped by a@.rcraft to evrde
missile fire. It was felt that ttiis would elicit an enemy response
to which attack aircraft on station could respond to.
Unfortunately, there was no enemy response. The raids assisted in
ambiguity operations, enabled the division to retain the ii-iitiative
during pre-ground operations and engage high value targets.
TARGETIN{3
The ultimate aim of the division's targeting effort was the
destruction of the Iraqi soldiers' will to fight. Within this, the
focus was to eliminate or reduce Iraqi capabilities and systems
upon which they were most reliant. The destruction of artillery
systems, which formed the backbone of the Iraqi defenses and were
capable of dF--Iivering chemical Munitions, was critical to the
success of the division's overall scheme of maneuver.
Specifically, the precedence for engagement c7+ targets during
offensive operations was as follows:
1. NBC delivery means aiid munitions sites
2. Fire Support (MRL's long range systems (>25K), SP
ENCLOSURE (1)
UNCLASSIFIED
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search