Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 970725_dec96_decls29_0014.txt
Subject = COMMAND CHRONOLOGY 11TH MARINES 13 MAR 91
Parent Organization = SECDEF
Unit = HQMC
Folder Title = 11TH MARINES COMMAND CHRONOLOGY JAN FEB 91 SEC 1 OF 2
Document Number = 1
Box ID = BX600135
UNCLASSIFIED"-z@
A and C and against a suspected enemy counterattack in the vicini4-,-
of the Al Burqan oil field.
The clearance of fires was expected to be, and certainly was,
one of the biggest challenges in providing fire support to the
division's scheme of maneuver. In maneuver warfare, the fixed
boundaries which clearly Delineate fire support responsibilities
frequently changed. In addition, as maneuver units rapidly
advanced with other task forces -Following in trace, the danger&, of
fratricide increased. In the fire support plan, task force
commanders could choose to establish their policy of clearance
between their fire support coordinator and firing units prior to
each mission. Fires were cleared, normally, by one of two means
within the division, either over the division Fire Support
Coordination (FSC) 1 net, or over lower level FSC nets. It was not
unusual during the war for the division FSCC to deny clearance
based on proximity of friendly troops or lact@ of communications
with affected friendly units. Direct communications between fire
support coordinators by entpring an adjacent unit's FSC net also
enabled fires to be cleared at the lowest -Feasible level. The vast
majority of friendly-on-+riendly fires were prevented through
established clearance procedures. The few instances in which this
did not occur resulted in :, check-fire by llth Marines headquarters
until the problem could be resolved.
Naval gunfire had a limited but positive impact on the war
effort. Initially, the USE Missouri (BB63) was in general support
of I MEF. Using her organic Remotely Piloted Vehicles (RPV), the
battleship conducted missirns in support of MARCENT operations. On
26 Feb, the USS Wisconsin (BB64) was assigned the mission of
general support to lst MarDiv with priority of fires to TF
Shepherd. Eight targets were identified east of Kuwait
International Airport for attack on the morning of 26 Feb. Using
an OV-10 as an aerial observer platform, a fire mission wRs also
called in on an Army barracks east a-F the Kuwait International
Airport. After two adjustment rounds, fire for effect was
initiated. Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) subsequently confirmed
three direct hits of 16" rounds on the target. Due to very poor
visibility (smole from oil fires) and the unavailability of an air
platform, no tdditional missions were conducted by a battleship
supporting Ist MarDiv units.
The majority of the division FSCC"s targeting effort was
conducted prior to the ground offensive. The Target In-Formation
Officer 4c3cused the bombing campaign to shape the battlefield in
accordance with the intent of tt-.e division commander. At the onset
of the ground war, reactive targeting claimed the majority of the
division's engagement assets, although deliberate targeting was
still conducted through intelligence channels.
One limitation of -Fire support coordination conducted through
the division main FSCC was caused by the lack of effective radio
communications between the division main FSCC, forward task force
FSCCS, and at times, with the division forward FSCC/ mobile command
ENCLOSURE (1)
UNCLASSIFIED
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search