Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 961031_950901_0632rpt_91s.txtBioiogical warfare (BW) Associatlon of Abu Ghurayb Filename:0632rpt.91s [ (b)(2) ] [ (b)(2) ] PASS TO THE ITF OPS OFFICER 09\02\91 0330 SENT BY: [ (b)(6) ] 1. The attached 6 February 1991 Position Paper "Biological Warfare (BW) Association of Abu Ghurayb "Infant Formula" Plant has been reviewed for accuracy in light of recent open press reporting. Information contained in press reports does not change the assessments presented in the 6 February Position Paper. 2. [ (b)(6) ] POSITION PAPER Subject: Bioiogical warfare (BW) Associatlon of Abu Ghurayb "Infant Formula" Plant 1. Purpose. To provide the DIA position on the function of the Abu Ghurayb "Infant Formula" Plant. 2 . (U) Discussion . a. This plant has been carried as a suspect facllity. It is not a confirmed BW plant. DIA does, however, have evidence of its BW connections. The plant was built by a French company, completed in 1982. It has never been used to produce infant formula, but has been maintained in mint condition. b. The plant has several features that do not belong in a baby formula production plant. Security is very tight --- the facility is surrounded by barbed wire and guard towers. In December 1990, when war looked imminent, the Iraqis began to camouflage the plant. If it was merely a baby formula plant, they could have made it obviously civilian, and DIA'S judgment about the facility might have been dlfferent. c. The equipment in the plant reportedly included fifteen fermentors and high efficiency particulate filters. Fermentors are for growing microorganisms and not producing infant formula. High efficiency particulate filters are associated with the containment of highly infectious microorganisms. The recently destroyed high containment BW facility at Salman Pak, for example, also had these types of filters installed. 3. The overall assessment on this plant is that it was correctly identified as suspect BW facility. Iraq may have intended it to be a backup plant for their agent production program. To that end, they took good care of it, but apparently never used it as an infant formula plant. The clumsy attempt to place formula around a plant to stage a media event backfired when the Nestle Company denied they had any connection to Iraq; Nestle products were shown on the video. 4. (U) [ (b)(2) ] Prepared by: [ (b)(6) ] Research and Technologies Division, [ (b)(2) ]
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search