Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 110596_sep96_decls12_0003.txt
Subject: BIOLOGICAL THREAT 12 OCT 90
Unit: OTSG
Parent Organization: HSC
Box ID: BX003202
Folder Title: BIOLOGICAL THREAT
Document Number: 1
Folder SEQ #: 28
UNCLAS@ED
7
@Lf wuuuu
untested and have been in storage since 1982.
e. The last field testing of the LASER system was in
1986. At that time the program was unfunded and the hardware was
loaned to Los Alamos National Laboratory for their studies on
other requirements. The time to complete development and commence
procurement is estimated as 6 months lead time to production, 2
months of production at a cost of $2 M RDT&E funds and $4 M in
OPA funds. In addition the systems will be required to be
supported by 2 modified fixed wing aircraft and 1 standard
helicopter on a full time basis. A culling system to get the
LASER aircraft in position for real time warning is also
required. This system will require contractor maintenance in
country. The system will present an eye hazard and operating
personnel will require laser eye protection, The risk for this
system is high for cost and schedule and moderate for
performance. There is only an experimental development model of
the LASER system available.
f. (U) Chances of success in providing a near term capability
or even a mid-term capability without a significant break through
in technology are considered low to very low. Providing devices
to the AOR which have not been adequately developed and tested
would constitute a potential for false sense of security and may
lead to more problems than not having a detector.
g. @ in the absence of a detector, immunizations could
substantially improve the protective posture of personnel present
in the AOR. The required doses necessary to infect personnel who
are immunized would increase to a point where it might not be
and maintain the on site
concentration, ie it would take more agent than is readily
available or producible. In fact immunization might even be
considered a deterrent from that point of view.
h. (U) OTSG and ODCSINT concur.
3. @ Recommendations. a) Since the current proposed devices do
not and can not meet the near term or even mid-term r@irement
they should not be surged into the system. b) that the AMC be
directed to re-establish the IASER programs within their current
resources temporarily and submit the LASER as a PARR issue in the
coming budgetary discussions. c) OTSG should be prepared to
commence immunization as soon as practicable with priority given
to the highest risk personnel
LOUIS J. DEL ROSSO
Major General, GS
Director, Space and
Special Weapons
Dr. R.E. Boyle/DAMO-SWC/73535/SM-9
u
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
Document 5 f:/Week-36/BX003202/BIOLOGICAL THREAT/biological threat 12 oct 90:11049609101313
Control Fields 17
File Room = sep96_declassified
File Cabinet = Week-36
Box ID = BX003202
Unit = OTSG
Parent Organization = HSC
Folder Title = BIOLOGICAL THREAT
Folder Seq # = 28
Subject = BIOLOGICAL THREAT 12 OCT 90
Document Seq # = 1
Document Date =
Scan Date =
Queued for Declassification = 01-JAN-1980
Short Term Referral = 01-JAN-1980
Long Term Referral = 01-JAN-1980
Permanent Referral = 01-JAN-1980
Non-Health Related Document = 01-JAN-1980
Declassified = 04-NOV-1996